Connect with us

Technology

Apple takes on recipe apps with Apple News+ Food

Published

on


Recipe app developers just got new competition. On Friday, Apple introduced a soon-to-launch feature for Apple News+ subscribers called Apple News+ Food, a new section that will allow users to search, discover, save, and easily cook recipes from dozens of existing News+ publishing partners.

It’s set to roll out as part of iOS 18.4 and iPadOS 18.4 in April, but only in the U.S., U.K., Canada, and Australia.

Instead of building a stand-alone recipe app that could import content from all over the web — like recipes from blogs or TikTok videos — Apple News+ Food will only focus on recipes offered by Apple News+ publishers.

Image Credits:Apple

At launch, Apple aims to have north of 30 publishers on board, up from the 20 it’s currently testing. Existing partners include well-known brands like Allrecipes, Bon Appétit, Food & Wine, Good Food, Serious Eats, Epicurious, Good Housekeeping, Better Homes & Gardens, Southern Living, Delish, Real Simple, Country Living, and others. Tens of thousands of recipes will be available through the Apple News+ Food service, the company notes.

The new experience lets Apple’s publishing partners get their content in front of more consumers at a time when Google’s ability to refer direct traffic to their websites continues to decline.

iPhone and iPad users will be able to find a new Food section by scrolling down in the Apple News app’s Today feed. Here, they’ll find a featured recipe, curated by Apple’s editorial team, followed by a collection of food and dining-related stories, a broader recipe collection, plus links to the Food+ recipe catalog and their own saved recipes.

Apple notes that select food stories and recipes will also be available for users who do not subscribe to Apple News+.

Image Credits:Apple

The Apple News+ Food subscription service can be accessed in multiple ways.

You can either tap on the “More food” link from the Food section in the app’s Today tab or you can tap on the link to “Food” from the Following tab. (The latter is a more direct method if you want to bypass reading the news articles and go straight to the recipes.)

In the Food+ section, users will see the featured recipe, which is updated daily, alongside an expanded set of recommended stories related to their interests. That personalization improves the more users engage with the app.

Other curated sections include those that link to your saved recipes or other types of recipe collections, like those from certain publishers, a selection of popular recipes, or those focused on some type of theme — like healthy eating or weeknight chicken dinners, for example.

As users browse the recipes, they can choose to save a recipe directly to the News app for later reference.

Image Credits:Apple

If users are searching for something specific, they can look through Apple’s News+ Food’s recipe catalog, tapping on buttons to narrow searches by various filters like “dinner,” “easy,” “vegetarian,” “under 30 minutes,” and more. Filters are also available for searching across your saved recipes.

The recipes themselves are formatted to be clutter and ad-free, as well as easy to read — an experience that’s far less common on today’s web.

Key information — including the ingredients, steps, description, cooking time, servings, and more — is pulled out and featured in a clear format that highlights a photo of the dish and links back to the publisher’s website.

Image Credits:Apple

Other features Apple added also come in handy. One lets you tap on an ingredient to see the amount needed without having to scroll back to the ingredients list. Another lets you tap on the cooking time in the recipe’s instructions to automatically start a timer on your iPhone or iPad.

A dedicated cooking mode is available, too, which displays the recipe in full screen with larger text so you can follow instructions with minimal tapping and scrolling. In this mode, the screen will stay on, even if your device is normally set to turn off the screen after a period of time.

Image Credits:Apple

One thing Apple News+ Food is missing, however, is the ability to add your own recipes or those saved from elsewhere on the web, as well as any tools to import or export recipes to and from other apps. You also can’t save recipes directly from social media, though many home chefs today find recipes on places like TikTok and Instagram Reels.

Image Credits:Apple

With the launch of Apple News+ Food, the tech giant continues to inch its way into the mobile app ecosystem where it competes with third-party developers who help the company generate revenue through App Store purchases. Recent additions to the Apple app lineup over the past year or so include the party-planning app Invites, iOS 18’s new Passwords app, the Sports app, and the mobile Journal, for example.

Unlike independent developers, Apple can afford to launch new apps that don’t have to be supported by a business model other than continued iPhone sales. This puts smaller and indie developers at a distinct disadvantage.

In the case of Apple News+ Food, publishers weren’t additionally compensated for their recipes, TechCrunch understands. Instead, the experience is an extension of Apple’s existing relationship with its partners, where the iPhone maker generates revenue by selling ads within the publishers’ articles for a 30% cut of sales.

The new service requires an Apple News+ subscription, which is $12.99 per month in the U.S., £12.99 in the U.K., $16.99 in Canada, and $19.99 in Australia. That includes access to over 400 magazines, newspapers, and digital publishers.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Technology

Did xAI lie about Grok 3’s benchmarks?

Published

on

By


Debates over AI benchmarks — and how they’re reported by AI labs — are spilling out into public view.

This week, an OpenAI employee accused Elon Musk’s AI company, xAI, of publishing misleading benchmark results for its latest AI model, Grok 3. One of the co-founders of xAI, Igor Babushkin, insisted that the company was in the right.

The truth lies somewhere in between.

In a post on xAI’s blog, the company published a graph showing Grok 3’s performance on AIME 2025, a collection of challenging math questions from a recent invitational mathematics exam. Some experts have questioned AIME’s validity as an AI benchmark. Nevertheless, AIME 2025 and older versions of the test are commonly used to probe a model’s math ability.

xAI’s graph showed two variants of Grok 3, Grok 3 Reasoning Beta and Grok 3 mini Reasoning, beating OpenAI’s best-performing available model, o3-mini-high, on AIME 2025. But OpenAI employees on X were quick to point out that xAI’s graph didn’t include o3-mini-high’s AIME 2025 score at “cons@64.”

What is cons@64, you might ask? Well, it’s short for “consensus@64,” and it basically gives a model 64 tries to answer each problem in a benchmark and takes the answers generated most frequently as the final answers. As you can imagine, cons@64 tends to boost models’ benchmark scores quite a bit, and omitting it from a graph might make it appear as though one model surpasses another when in reality, that’s isn’t the case.

Grok 3 Reasoning Beta and Grok 3 mini Reasoning’s scores for AIME 2025 at “@1” — meaning the first score the models got on the benchmark — fall below o3-mini-high’s score. Grok 3 Reasoning Beta also trails ever-so-slightly behind OpenAI’s o1 model set to “medium” computing. Yet xAI is advertising Grok 3 as the “world’s smartest AI.”

Babushkin argued on X that OpenAI has published similarly misleading benchmark charts in the past — albeit charts comparing the performance of its own models. A more neutral party in the debate put together a more “accurate” graph showing nearly every model’s performance at cons@64:

But as AI researcher Nathan Lambert pointed out in a post, perhaps the most important metric remains a mystery: the computational (and monetary) cost it took for each model to achieve its best score. That just goes to show how little most AI benchmarks communicate about models’ limitations — and their strengths.





Source link

Continue Reading

Technology

The pain of discontinued items, and the thrill of finding them online

Published

on

By


We’ve all been there. A favorite item is suddenly unavailable for purchase. Couldn’t the manufacturer have given you advance warning?

Whether owing to low sales, changing habits, production costs, or even because something is a little wrong with your favorite product (shh), discontinued items are part of life. In a weekend piece, the New York Times delves into the not-so-dark underbelly of online places where shoppers find these items, share tips and yes, find emotional support.

The story highlights a padded laptop bag made by Filson that a super fan now hunts “down everywhere” to snag as many as possible “before everyone figures out how great they are.” It points to Discontinued Beauty, a site whose offerings are old to visitors but new to the site. Among its latest products: an “essential protein restructurizer” by Redkin priced at an eye-popping $169.95. (The newest version of the product costs shoppers $32.)

Could it be dangerous to use these discontinued products? Who cares, suggests one creative director, who tells the Times about a lip pencil the beauty company NARS no longer sells and she has found elsewhere. “Now, do I know the proper way to store this for optimal conditions? No,” she says. “They’re under my sink.”  



Source link

Continue Reading

Technology

US AI Safety Institute could face big cuts

Published

on

By


The National Institute of Standards and Technology could fire as many as 500 staffers, according to multiple reports — cuts that further threaten a fledgling AI safety organization.

Axios reported this week that the US AI Safety Institute (AISI) and Chips for America, both part of NIST, would be “gutted” by layoffs targeting probationary employees (who are typically in their first year or two on the job). And Bloomberg said some of those employees had already been given verbal notice of upcoming terminations.

Even before the latest layoff reports, AISI’s future was looking uncertain. The institute, which is supposed to study risks and develop standards around AI development, was created last year as part of then-President Joe Biden’s executive order on AI safety. President Donald Trump repealed that order on his first day back in office, and AISI’s director departed earlier in February.

Fortune spoke to a number of AI safety and policy organizations who all criticized the reported layoffs.

“These cuts, if confirmed, would severely impact the government’s capacity to research and address critical AI safety concerns at a time when such expertise is more vital than ever,” said Jason Green-Lowe, executive director of the Center for AI Policy.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024. NewsDial